[update below] [2nd update below] [3rd update below]
And the fascistic Republican Party. Eons ago, before January 6th, I had pledged to focus less on American politics after the inauguration—and a consequent return to a semblance of normalcy in the White House, which we have indeed been happily observing; so far the Biden administration gets a grade of ‘A’ —and direct AWAV’s attentions to other pressing subjects, notably what’s happening in France as she enters a presidential election year. No such luck. I do indeed closely follow politics chez moi but have continued to do so obsessively with unfolding events outre-Atlantique, most recently of the impeachment trial, which I watched in part on CNN. The video footage of the January 6th insurrection exhibited by the House impeachment managers, which everyone has seen by now (if not, here and here), is devastating, confirming how close we were on that day to a bloodbath in the Capitol that would have, among many other things, decapitated the line of succession to the presidency—with the murder of Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi—thereby upending the certification of the Electoral College vote by the Senate, and paving the way for Trump to proclaim martial law. It was really that close.
It continues to defy belief that an insurrectionary mob—and one that was armed to boot—was able to reach the Capitol and then penetrate it. Even on the most violent days of the Gilets Jaunes movement in France, GJs were not allowed to approach the Élysée palace, Palais Bourbon, or regalian ministries. Had any tried, the police would have employed any and all means to prevent them from doing so.
That the Republican Party in its overwhelming majority could continue to support Trump after January 6th, not to mention promote the QAnon adept Marjorie Taylor Greene, shows how far down the road to outright fascism that party has travelled. If one missed it, the conservative Michael Gerson, who was George W. Bush’s speechwriter, matter of factly observed in a Washington Post column dated February 1st that “Trumpism is American fascism.” No less.
On the question of fascism in America, Vox’s Sean Illing interviewed Yale University philosopher Jason Stanley, who has recently published a book on the broad topic, on how “American fascism isn’t going away.” In a course I teach to American undergraduates on European history, I devote part of a lecture on the interwar period to fascism and how to understand it, in which I stress, as does Jason Stanley, that it is less an ideology or regime type—though it can of course be this—than a world-view and way of doing politics, of an overriding will to power. Fascism, like populism, is a syndrome. In the lecture I enumerate sixteen features of fascism, adding, as an aside, that all but three or four applied in large part or in whole to the Trump phenomenon.
And then there is fascism’s mass base. The lead article in the February 11th issue of The New York Review of Books, “‘Be Ready to Fight’,” by Mark Danner, is on the January 6th insurrection. The lede: “Trumpism is driven by cruelty and domination even as its rhetoric claims grievance and victimization. The attack on the Capitol showed that Donald Trump’s army of millions will not just melt away when he leaves office.” This passage merits quoting:
Deafening paroxysms of jubilation and rage greeted this doctrinal statement of Trumpism, for who could better summarize the philosophy, such as it was, in fewer words? Trump as Rambo, as tank commander, motorcycle gang leader, and on and on. The imagery of Trumpism is about strength and cruelty and dominance even as the rhetoric is about loss and grievance and victimization: about what was taken and what must be seized back by strength. And we would have to bring that strength, for certain it was that the politicians would turn out to be traitors, just like all the rest. From that fateful ride down the gilt staircase in the pink-marbled lobby of Trump Tower five years before—Trumpism’s March on Rome—it had been about this: “Taking back the country.” Taking it back from the rapists and the killers, the undocumented and the illegitimate, the Black and the brown from “shithole countries” who should go back “where they came from.” Now it had all come down to this.
And this:
Donald Trump is not Caesar, but he has a will to power and a malignancy that our degraded institutions and corrupted politicians have been wholly unable to contain. His army of millions will not melt away. They will remain as a lurking poison in the political bloodstream, politicized and angry, ready to be activated, and their nihilistic rejection of the country’s institutions and laws will only grow more venomous. Millions of them are armed. Those who died in the coup will become the movement’s martyrs. Those arrested will become its heroes.
For more on the Zeitgeist of the January 6th mob, see the report in ProPublica on “what the Parler videos reveal,” plus this Twitter thread from Insider News “decod[ing] the symbols that Trump supporters brought with them, revealing some ongoing threats to US democracy.”
The NYT report on “Trump’s legacy: Voters who reject democracy and any politics but their own,” may also be read with profit.
France 2’s weekly news magazine Envoyé Spécial aired a 25-minute report on January 21st on Trump’s hardcore supporters—”les irréductibles”—with the reporter interviewing several, in Florida, Georgia, and Colorado, and following them around, listening to them vent their anger—an emotion strongly felt by all—resentments and hatreds, not to mention conspiracy theories and a view of the world and reality that is, needless to say, utterly antithetical to mine and no doubt to anyone reading this. It’s one of the best reports I’ve seen on Trump’s base and which may be viewed here.
Objectively speaking, these Trump people have nothing to be angry about or any good reason to hate people like us (i.e. me and AWAV readers). They lead reasonably comfortable middle class lives, with the financial resources to purchase their homes, high end pick-up trucks, arsenals of weapons, and whatever else they may fancy. And many of them live very well indeed, thank you very much. These are not Gilets Jaunes, who live from paycheck to paycheck and barely make it to the end of the month. As The Atlantic’s Adam Serwer underscored, the Trumpist mob on January 6th was not “low class.”
In terms of Weltanschauung and general intellect, the Trump base is naturally at one with Marjorie Taylor Greene, whose level of culture générale may be grasped in this video here. Not to sound like an intellectual snob or anything but seriously, how can people—particularly those who run for public office—be so f*cking stupid?? And for the House Republicans to put such an abject, thoroughly uneducated ignoramus on the Committee on Education?
The ignorance and stupidity—and penchant for fascism—could not attain the level that it has on the American right without the conservative media ecosystem, a.k.a. the Trumpist/Republican propaganda apparatus fostering an alternate reality, which has no equivalent in other Western democracies save a couple. A recent case in point (watch the video):
This is infowars shit, just a completely batshit conspiracy theory blasted into your meemaws face pic.twitter.com/pjHzzeo5At
— Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew_lawrence) February 11, 2021
Jason Stanley, in the interview linked to above, says he thinks Tucker Carlson is a “likely future president.” No comment.
One big feature of the Trump/Republican base—and which was heavily represented on January 6th—is the evangelicals. We fully understand their weight as voters but I admit to having difficulty grasping their presence as shock troops in a violent insurrectionary movement. But such is indeed the case. See, e.g., this Vice News report on Christian imagery on January 6th, by a team of Columbia University researchers.
Rod Dreher, who is senior editor at The American Conservative—and is culturally and religiously conservative (he’s a Catholic convert to the Eastern Orthodox Church) but not a Trumper—had a most interesting report on “what [he] saw at the Jericho March” in Washington on December 12th (if you don’t know what the Jericho March is, see here).
It’s one thing to have to deal with the reality of a mass fascist mob in your polity, but when they’re religious fanatics brandishing the Bible (or Qur’an, or Torah, etc)—and are heavily armed—that makes them that much more dangerous and frightening.
One more piece, by historian Matthew Avery Sutton of Washington State University, in TNR: “The Capitol riot revealed the darkest nightmares of White evangelical America: How 150 years of apocalyptic agitation culminated in an insurrection.”
Back to the impeachment trial, it was a foregone conclusion that there weren’t going to be 17 Republican votes to convict. The Democrats certainly could have adopted a different approach to impeachment and “that could have made Republicans squirm,” as Stanford Law School professor Michael W. McConnell spelled out in an opinion piece in the NYT. But as David Frum convincingly argued, the efforts of the House impeachment managers “[will] do.” Whatever this or that pundit or Trump sycophant may opine, Trump—now definitively banished from Twitter (ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّٰهِ)—is toast. There’s not a chance he’ll make a successful comeback in 2024.
As for those House impeachment managers, there were some real revelations, for me and many others, notably the brilliant Jamie Raskin—who has serious lefty cred—and likewise brilliant Stacey Plaskett, who is an argument in itself for the US Virgin Islands becoming the 53rd state (after the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico).
Cf. the whack jobs and crackpottery of Trump’s defense lawyers. When it comes to human capital, we are just so far superior to them.
À suivre.
UPDATE: The NYT has an article (Feb. 15th) on Adam Kinzinger, one of the ten Republican congresspersons who voted to impeach Trump. It begins:
As the Republican Party censures, condemns and seeks to purge leaders who aren’t in lock step with Donald J. Trump, Adam Kinzinger, the six-term Illinois congressman, stands as enemy No. 1 — unwelcome not just in his party but also in his own family, some of whom recently disowned him.
Two days after Mr. Kinzinger called for removing Mr. Trump from office following the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol, 11 members of his family sent him a handwritten two-page letter, saying he was in cahoots with “the devil’s army” for making a public break with the president.
“Oh my, what a disappointment you are to us and to God!” they wrote. “You have embarrassed the Kinzinger family name!”
The author of the letter was Karen Otto, Mr. Kinzinger’s cousin, who paid $7 to send it by certified mail to Mr. Kinzinger’s father — to make sure the congressman would see it, which he did. She also sent copies to Republicans across Illinois, including other members of the state’s congressional delegation.
“I wanted Adam to be shunned,” she said in an interview.
The article has the letter in PDF. Do read it. It’s breathtaking.
2nd UPDATE: Andrew Sullivan has a very good post mortem on the impeachment trial, “Convict him: This really shouldn’t be hard,” which I read after posting.
See also New School for Social Research history professor Eli Zaretsky’s LRB blog post, “The big lie.”
3rd UPDATE: The Atlantic’s Emma Green has an interview with Eric Metaxas—who, if one doesn’t know, is an NYC-based radio host, prolific author of savant-sounding books, a devout Christian, and Trump acolyte—who is convinced, entre autres, that the Democrats are pulling America in the direction of Nazi Germany. Sans blague. Metaxas is also a graduate of an Ivy League university (Yale), as are other high-profile Trump acolytes, e.g. Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton, Kris Kobach—which all goes to show that one can be an excellent student and very bright but nonetheless be intellectually unhinged and generally off one’s rocker.
What all of these men have in common is devout religious faith—and which borders on fanaticism in the case of Metaxas and Hawley, and maybe the others too. It is the intense religiosity of close to half of the Republican electorate—and a large number of the party’s elected officials and representatives—that differentiates that party from conservative parties of government in other Western polities. And which—along with the gun culture—makes the Republican Party that much more dangerous.
Arun, your view of the right is correct. I fully agree with your assessment.
However there is more than one way to be fascist.
Those who clamor for, or even more, actively bring censorship onto ideas they don’t share conveniently ignore that these tools will be foisted upon them as soon as the opportunity arises.
Those who out others for what most often is a minor (and should-be inconsequential) slip of the tongue, throwing at them shame and extrajudicial punishment, act as if they possessed the only truth.
Those attached to lives at home, be it minorities or any other, but who forget the lives lost through the foreign policies of their government, lose all moral ground.
Those who applaud Biden when he does just the same as Trump, be it imperial aggression (e.g. on Iran, but so many to pick from) or continued prosecution of Assange, exhibit incredible intellectual flexibility that may only be possible without morals.
Fascism is a tenet of the system. What changes is form more than function. With Trump, it had the ugly form of (primarily) trash, poor uneducated white men. With Biden, the form will be polished and respectable. It’s possible it may also turn out to be more effective in further eroding freedoms at home and promoting the empire abroad, with its catastrophic cortege of human rights abuses.
I’m not sure what you’re getting at here but if you’re suggesting that Biden will merely be a Trump lite, or that Democrats will support him doing something that they would otherwise condemn in Trump, I’m sorry but that won’t fly.
Arun, you are way too subtle and articulate to have missed what I was getting at, and you don’t need to caricature it. Instead, you may want to consider the specific examples I provided. In their light, it’s obvious Biden is not getting an A-grade. Being less offensive than tRump does not in itself guarantee such a grade. Regards.
Francois, I am with our host on this — it isn’t clear what you mean, unless it is the argument that any American president is a fascist. Your only two specific examples — Iran and Assange — do not make any sense in the context of your comment, and make no sense in the context of the nascent Biden presidency, which is less than a month old. Biden has been clear that he wants the US and Iran to re-implement JCPOA. And while I imagine that the Assange indictment is under review, as is everything done by the last administration*, it is a good thing for a president to not be involved with what prosecutions the Department of Justice decides to pursue. Biden should have no role in whether DoJ pursues its indictment of Assange. That’s what we want.
Il n’est pire sourd que qui ne veut entendre…
Either you are making the claim that it’s too early to judge the Biden administration, in which case no grade can be given. Or you selectively and arbitrarily drop specific decisions they have made because it’s “nascent”. Should you factor all aspects to date, you’d have to consider the Biden administration did in fact make decisions already on both Iran and Assange that are to continue tRump’s. They might change in the future, but neither you nor I can tell. On the basis of what we know, I stand by my earlier points.
Do also note that on Assange, the Obama administration and the tRump one had very different policies, which the press associating the policies with direct input from the presidents. That Biden’s administration decides to continue tRump’s policy instead of reverting to Obama’s on such a critical free speech issue is significant and exemplary.
On Iran, Biden has stated clearly that he won’t lift the sanctions imposed by tRump in legal breach of the JCPOA. It’s hard to bring people back to something you unilaterally breached and indicate you will continue to breach.
Thank you, Arun. I have nothing to add to this post, which expressed my own feelings so well. My husband compares the Jan. 6 mob to the Gilets Jaune, even saying that they did try to get to the Elysée, but if they tried, they were effectively repelled. And I agree with you that the Gilets Jaune are not the same segment of the population as the Jan. 6 mob in D.C.
Thanks Ellen. There are a few superficial similarities between the Gilets Jaunes and Trump base (of which the Jan. 6th mob is part and parcel), e.g. the non-urban character, educational attainment, and penchant for conspiracy theories, but the differences are far greater, most notably the simple fact that the GJs were politically unclassifiable, refused to align with any political party, and rejected the emergence of any dominant or charismatic figure from within their ranks or outside. The Trump base is the hard right-wing of the Republican Party – movement conservatives – whose French equivalent is the FN/RN and right-wing souverainistes (Dupont-Aignan, de Villiers et al).
You summed up the situation perfectly. It is a dangerous time in the country, and will be for the foreseeable future. I cannot see how the nation can hold together, with the GOP lurching off to the far right, having support of only 30-40% of the country, but remaining electorally viable because of the various anti-democratic and counter-majoritarian features of our system. (A side note – why the Democratic Party isn’t going full throttle for DC statehood is beyond me – do you think McConnell would leave two Senate seats on the table year after year?) My “hope” for the future is that the country will do a Velvet Divorce instead of a repeat of the 1860s. Things cannot stand as they are. Something has to give. Or, as the poet said, “Things fall apart; the center cannot hold.” (Later in the same poem, and perhaps more apt – “The best lack all conviction, while the worst/Are full of passionate intensity.”)
On the Kitzinger letter – the funniest, and saddest, part of that screed was her insistence that Trump was a Christian. . . .
DC and Puerto Rican statehood will necessitate abolishing the filibuster. We’ll see if that happens before the next midterms. If so, inshallah, the first order of business will be enacting the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.
America is not ‘one nation’ and should indeed be broken up, into seven parts I say. I have a plan for this – admittedly neither here nor there – which maybe I’ll elaborate on AWAV at some point.
Yes, the bit in the Kinzinger letter about Trump being a good Christian was indeed LOL-inducing.
I am wondering about whether one can really extrapolate from the mob at the capitol to the broader base of support of Trump. Rather obviously they are in some sense different — one group stayed home and perhaps yelled at their TV, the other traveled, rioted, engaged in terrible violence and destruction of property, publicized their crimes on Facebook, and then many were marched off to jail. So can one really extrapolate? And I wonder about extrapolating from a moment in time to a future — hoping and praying that time makes clear how dastardly and pointless is such rioting.
I am also wondering (considering the many ways the compulsively driven imbecile Trump undermined his capacity to conduct a successful coup and the sheer stupidity of his followers) if only a fool would attempt a coup, thereby ruling out its chances of success.