[update below] [2nd update below] [3rd update below] [4th update below]
I posted a commentary by Adam Gopnik several hours ago, on Obama, Romney, and Adam Smith. Here’s another, this one on the Aurora massacre. Gopnik is angry at America’s insane gun culture and rightly so. Money quote
The truth is made worse by the reality that no one—really no one—anywhere on the political spectrum has the courage to speak out about the madness of unleashed guns and what they do to American life. That includes the President, whose consoling message managed to avoid the issue of why these killings take place. Of course, we don’t know, and perhaps never will, what exactly “made him” do what he did; but we know how he did it. Those who fight for the right of every madman and every criminal to have as many people-killing weapons as they want share moral responsibility for what happened last night—as they will when it happens again. And it will happen again.
The reality is simple: every country struggles with madmen and ideologues with guns, and every country—Canada, Norway, Britain—has had a gun massacre once, or twice. Then people act to stop them, and they do—as over the past few years has happened in Australia. Only in America are gun massacres of this kind routine, expectable, and certain to continue. Does anyone even remember any longer last July’s gun massacre, those birthday-party killings in Texas, when an estranged husband murdered his wife and most of her family, leaving six dead?
But nothing changes: the blood lobby still blares out its certainties, including the pretense that the Second Amendment—despite the clear grammar of its first sentence—is designed not to protect citizen militias but to make sure that no lunatic goes unarmed. (Jill Lepore wrote about the history of the Second Amendment in The New Yorker recently.) Make sure that guns designed for no reason save to kill people are freely available to anyone who wants one—and that is, and remains, the essential American condition—and then be shocked when children are killed.
Only in America, Gopnik says, in the Western world at least. American exceptionalism at its least admirable.
UPDATE: James Fallows in The Atlantic writes about “the certainty of more shootings.”
2nd UPDATE: Rick Schmitt in Mother Jones describes how the Blood Lobby, a.k.a. the NRA, “pushed the right to pack heat anywhere.”
3rd UPDATE: David Weigel in Slate asks if “a brave citizen with a concealed weapon [could] have prevented the Aurora shootings.” Answer: no.
4th UPDATE: Bill Moyers and Michael Winship have an excellent piece in Salon, where they observe that ”the NRA has America living under the gun” and that “the arsenal of democracy has been transformed into the arsenal of death.”

How come Weigel’s so sure this couldn’t have happened:
[yes, I know the shooter in Aurora used gas and had body armor on, but who knows how he would have held up if he was shot at or even got a good shot at his gun and then someone else tackled him]
The real question is why do we allow crazy people to walk around in America? We used to lock them up.
@Fake Herzog
You’re on the right track.
The nonsense about the subject posted by leftist liberals who are not thinking this through and merely mouthing the left’s anti 2nd amendment talking points is foolish and dangerous.
Out there in real America, the thinking and feelings are completely different from the pacified European leftist mentality that couldn’t or wouldn’t even be able to defend themselves, their families or property.
This text from my MIL who has a vacation home 45 miles from Aurora CO says it all:
”J and L love movies, but fortunately never got around to going this week. Can’t even go to a movie anymore. What a bitch!
Too bad someone in the audience wasn’t armed to take the motherf***er down.”
This from my wonderful MIL who is 67, a practicing neurologist (MD)
with a Phd.
Her Daddy was a preacher in Colorado who carried the collection plate in one hand, and a gun in the other.
No one ever stole from that church!
God rest the souls of the victims and give solace and peace to their families.
CCinna, your MIL may be wonderful indeed but, WADR, she’s also a nutbag. Her daddy too. I could, in fact, use stronger language to characterize him but will resist the temptation. What crackpot mentalities they have.
“The real question is why do we allow crazy people to walk around in America? We used to lock them up.” Um, excuse me Fake Herzog but James Holmes had no police record prior to the shooting, so there was no way he could have been locked up. As for the video you link to, this is irrelevant to what happened in Aurora. It is one thing for a store owner to have a licensed handgun on the premesis – this is allowed even in France (as it happens, just three days ago, in Paris’ 7th arrondissement, a robber in a jewelry store was shot by the owner, who was in legal possession of his gun) – and quite another to allow weapons into movie theaters and by all and sundry. I’m sorry but anyone who believes this should be legal is deranged, politically and no doubt mentally too.
Arun,
The guy who see in that video was just another internet cafe patron, who happend to be packing heat, not the cafe owner.
Whatever the café patron’s reason for carrying his concealed handgun he sure is lucky he didn’t seriously wound or kill anyone, either a bystander or the robbers themselves (who, if they’d been killed, would have been hit by a bullet in the back). If so, he should have been arrested and prosecuted. It is simply crazy that ordinary citizens should be able to legally pack heat in public, and without a permit delivered for a truly compelling reason.
You see, where handguns – not to mention assault weapons – are available over the counter or the Internet, the criminals will easily get them too. And we will simply have a more violent society and with many more gun-related deaths.
And with respect to crazy people, the idea is to get them into treatment before they have a criminal record, even if they have to go involuntarily:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/310244/paranoid-schizophrenia-and-violence-jack-fowler
There were apparently no indications that James Holmes was suffering from schizophrenia before his act (unlike the shooter at Virginia Tech). But even if there had been, what could have been done? One cannot intern someone who has not committed a criminal act.
And then there’s the matter of budget cuts in mental health facilities and treatment, but we won’t get into that here…
[...] massacre in Newtown CT, nothing that I did not say in my posts on the Aurora massacre in July (here and here) or the one in Norway last year (here) in any case. Except to shout—and for the [...]